Editorial Policy
How IELTS Writing AI keeps educational pages useful and trustworthy
This policy explains how articles, landing pages, and study resources are written, reviewed, refreshed, and corrected so users can trust what they read before relying on the product.
Student-first
Pages are written to help candidates decide what to fix next
Criteria-linked
Advice is expected to connect back to real IELTS writing criteria
No false promises
The site avoids guaranteed-score claims and inflated certainty
What this editorial policy requires
The site is not supposed to win trust through louder claims. It is supposed to win trust by giving clearer, more criteria-linked help to students who need to know what to revise next.
Educational intent first
Content is written to help IELTS candidates understand scoring criteria, revision patterns, and study decisions. Commercial claims should not replace educational explanation.
Criteria-based writing
Pages covering score improvement should map advice back to Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy whenever possible.
Refresh and correction workflow
High-value pages are reviewed when score criteria explanations drift, product behavior changes, or users report unclear examples. Corrections are routed through support.
No guaranteed-score claims
The site can explain likely bottlenecks and revision priorities, but it does not promise a specific official IELTS result.
What a page should do before it earns trust
- The page should explain score problems in a way a real IELTS candidate can use in the next draft.
- Examples and recommendations should still match current product behavior and current page intent.
- Commercial messaging should support the educational explanation, not replace it.
When pages are updated
High-value pages are revisited when product behavior changes, score explanations drift, or users report unclear examples.
How corrections are handled
Reported issues are reviewed against the live page, the current product flow, and the intended IELTS criteria explanation before changes are published.
What the policy protects against
It reduces vague advice, outdated claims, and overly aggressive marketing language that would make the site feel less trustworthy to serious test takers.
Correction requests
If you see an unclear example, an outdated explanation, or a mismatch between a page and current product behavior, send the URL and issue to [email protected].
Want to see whether the policy matches the product?
Open the checker, compare the page promises with the actual feedback, and use the related trust pages to see how methodology, review, and editorial quality fit together.