IELTS Writing Coach Logo
Sample answer · for learningOpinion EssayHousing

IELTS Opinion Essay Example

Should old buildings be preserved or demolished to make way for modern development?

246 words
34 minutes
Example response

Key Features

  • Clear position with balanced acknowledgment
  • Cultural and practical arguments
  • Academic vocabulary
  • Sophisticated structures

Practice Your Writing

Get AI feedback on your essay

Sample Essay

The preservation of historic buildings in the face of urban development pressures has become a contentious issue in many cities worldwide. While I recognize the need for modernization and improved infrastructure, I strongly believe that preserving architecturally and culturally significant old buildings should take precedence over wholesale demolition.

Proponents of demolition argue that old buildings often fail to meet modern safety standards and lack the amenities required for contemporary living. They contend that replacing outdated structures with modern developments can provide better housing, commercial spaces, and public facilities for growing urban populations. Furthermore, new construction can incorporate energy-efficient technologies and sustainable design principles that reduce environmental impact, whereas retrofitting old buildings may be prohibitively expensive and less effective.

However, the indiscriminate destruction of historic structures represents an irreversible loss of cultural heritage. Old buildings tell the story of a city's evolution, reflecting architectural styles, historical events, and social changes that shaped the community's identity. Preservation maintains the unique character that distinguishes one city from another, attracting tourism and fostering civic pride. Moreover, many older buildings possess craftsmanship and materials superior to modern construction, and adaptive reuse projects can successfully combine historic character with modern functionality.

In conclusion, while selective redevelopment may be necessary for urban growth, I firmly believe that preserving historically significant buildings enriches cities culturally and economically, creating more livable and distinctive urban environments.

(Word count: 246)

Vocabulary Highlights

precedence

优先

Example use

“take precedence over”

indiscriminate

不加选择的

Example use

“indiscriminate destruction”

irreversible

不可逆的

Example use

“irreversible loss”

adaptive reuse

适应性再利用

Example use

“adaptive reuse projects”

Grammar Highlights

While I recognize the need... I strongly believe (concessive)

that old buildings often fail to meet (noun clause)

reflecting architectural styles (present participle)

that preserving historically significant buildings (noun clause)

Essay Structure

Introduction

Context + thesis (preserve significant buildings)

Body Paragraph 1

Counter-argument: Benefits of demolition

Body Paragraph 2

Main argument: Cultural heritage, craftsmanship, adaptive reuse

Conclusion

Restate position + broader benefits

Illustrative notes by assessment criterion

Task Response

Sample note

Fully addresses the task. Clear position with well-developed arguments.

How fully the question is answered, position is clear, ideas are developed

Coherence and Cohesion

Sample note

Logical organization. Effective cohesive devices.

Organization, paragraphing, and use of cohesive devices

Lexical Resource

Sample note

Wide range with sophisticated word choice.

Vocabulary range, accuracy, and appropriateness

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

Sample note

Complex structures with flexibility.

Variety and accuracy of grammatical structures

Related Samples

Practice Makes Perfect

Use this sample to study structure and development. Then check your own Task 2 response and see what to improve next.