主なチェック
Whether each body paragraph has one clear controlling idea
See where your Task 2 support stays too general, which paragraph feels thin, and what kind of explanation or example should come next.
Free entry point
Use this page when your Task 2 essay has a position but the body paragraphs still feel thin, general, or unsupported.
まず無料でスキャン。クレジットカードは不要です。
live checker を開く前に、どのような特化型診断が得られるかを確認できます。
Overall Band
6.0
This preview shows the kind of idea-development diagnosis students should see before line-editing the whole essay.
まずメイン checker でライブ診断を行い、その後このページに戻って、この採点上の問題がどのように現れ、どう直すべきかを理解します。
まずエッセイを live checker に通し、その後このページで特化型の修正パターンをより明確に理解します。
Whether each body paragraph has one clear controlling idea
Whether explanations show why the idea matters instead of repeating the claim
Whether examples are specific enough to support the argument
Whether the conclusion follows from the developed ideas
A checker is most useful when you treat it as a diagnosis, not a final judgement. Start by reading the weakest IELTS criterion first, because that is usually where the fastest improvement sits. If Task Response or Task Achievement is low, fix the answer, overview, examples, and coverage before editing individual sentences. If Coherence is weak, check whether each paragraph has one clear job and whether the reader can follow the argument without guessing.
After that, use the vocabulary and grammar feedback more selectively. Do not replace every simple word with a complex one. IELTS rewards clear, accurate language that fits the topic. The best workflow is to run one draft, rewrite the highest-impact paragraph, and then check the revised version. This turns the tool into a feedback loop: each scan gives you one practical revision target, and each rewrite shows whether the draft is moving closer to your target band.
Task 2 essays often look organized on the surface while still losing marks because the body paragraphs never move beyond a broad claim.
Students then over-edit grammar or vocabulary when the real problem is that the explanation does not show cause, effect, relevance, or a convincing real-world example.
A focused idea-development checker gives the rewrite a narrower job: strengthen one paragraph until the support genuinely earns the position you already stated.
Evaluation Quality & Trust
当社の評価エンジンは、IELTS公式の評価基準に基づいてトレーニングおよび調整されています。エッセイを4つの重要なスコア要素で分析し、次に修正すべき最も効果的なポイントを特定します。
Criterion-first
Built to diagnose whether the draft is losing points on TR, CC, LR, or GRA before anything else.
±0.5
Close enough to guide the next revision move, even before a full mock test or teacher review.
4 criteria
Keeps students from fixing surface grammar when the real score blocker sits in ideas or structure.
Student outcomes

“A teacher review costs $30 and takes three days. This is free and instant. It told me Coherence was the issue, which matched exactly what my teacher had been saying for months.”

“I took the IELTS four times and couldn't break 6.5. After using this I realized I was always losing points on the same criterion and had no idea. Now I know exactly what to practice.”
Study high-scoring essays with criterion-by-criterion analysis before checking your own draft.
Use a practical Band 7 roadmap for Task 1, Task 2, planning, and revision.
Understand what examiners look for across Task Response, Coherence, Vocabulary, and Grammar.
Compare checker workflows and decide what level of feedback you need next.